Take a look at the followingĪnd if i hover my mouse on the caution label again it came up with completely different resultsĬan somebody please tell me if this is a good thing or a really bad thing and if it is bad thing what can i do without apart from replacing the hard drive, bacause i tried opening my laptop and i almost broke the keyboard and i have to note that i dont have warranty now because i destroyed the warranty stiker (im stupid i know). I saw the problems and they were the following ->Ġ5 Reallocated Sectors Count Ĭ5 Current Pending Sector Count Ĭ6 Uncorrectable Sector Count threshold 0]Īnd if i hover my mouse on the caution label under the health status i see the three errors but with different numbers these areĪfter 1 day i decided to run the app again and it came up with different results. So when i opened the app the first thing i saw was Drive Health being at Caution level. The incremental/differential part means when you do the next backup, only the stuff which has changed gets backed up so it takes considerably less time.Hello guys, today i decided to run a health test on my 2 month old laptop. These will backup all your files into a single file (preferably on an external hard drive), and allow you to restore files by navigating that single file. Caution C6 Uncorrectable Sector Count : 8. My drive's health status on CrystalDiskInfo is Caution, when I hover over it - it says: Caution C5 Current Pending Sector Count : 8. Later, when some of these sectors are read successfully, the value is decreased. CrystalDiskInfo Uncorrectable sector amount: 8. The raw value of this attribute indicates the total number of sectors waiting for remapping. Macrium Reflect and Easeus ToDo seem to be popular choices. parameter is a critical parameter and indicates the current count of unstable sectors (waiting for remapping). In the future, you should implement a real backup system with incremental or differential backups. Some of the copy bugs I've run across are more likely to show up when you're trying to copy millions of files at once. copy one main folder at a time, rather than the entire drive at once. Since this is a one-time thing, manually copying everything like that should be fine (you may have to turn on the verify after copy option). Is there any different than using Windows to backup data? P/s 2: I read a few old threads on the forum and people suggested that I can boot into Ubuntu to start the backup. P/s: My OS is on another drive so there shoud be no problem to use copy software on Windows. Will that be enough or another method should be use? How should I proceed with the backup? I intend to setup the new and old HDDs on my PC, log into Windows and use a copy software which you mentioned to backup data. With Windows' default copier, if you try to copy a folder and a single file fails to copy, the entire copy process stops and you don't know which files were successfully copied and which weren't. The features you're looking for are the ability to fail a copy on a file-by-file basis, and verify after copy. I've heard good things about Robocopy and Supercopier. I use Teracopy, but have found the current version to be buggy (I'm still on 2.27). Probably a bearing is going (causing the heads to lose alignment with the tracks on the platters), or some debris has flaked or broken off inside and is in the process of destroying the platter surfaces as they spin.īackup your data ASAP and replace the drive. If the Pending Sector Count is increasing fast enough for you to actually notice it, your drive is failing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |